City Councilor Brian Eades, in one of his moments of hubris, seems to think we serfs could only come before the royals to ask questions. Of course, that only gives councilors the chance to spin and bamboozle. Nevertheless, I posed some questions to which, I believe, the public, voters and taxpayers deserve answers. Want to see those questions? Click Read More. But don’t look for answers. Those haven’t been forthcoming.
So, you want questions. OK, here are some questions.
First question: Are you up to answering the following questions honestly?
If you’re so wedded to facts and evidence in making public policy, why did you ignore them in choosing Wallace Bajjali? Why did you and the council ignore The Amarillo Independent’s findings?
Why did Alan Taylor retire? Was there any truth to the rumor that he disagreed with the downtown plan?
The Strategic Action Plan effort had fewer than 1,000 participants. Why did the City Council consider that representative of the city?
Why was the Herring not included in the land use planning? Why has the City Council ignored the Herring Hotel as a resource for conventions? Who is behind the squeeze play on the Herring?
What happened to the “citizen vote” that was promised? With such a pathetic voter turnout in 2013, how can you justify that this was a mandate or endorsement of the ongoing plans?
If the new hotel is such a strong asset, why does it need to be protected by a non-compete clause?
How does city ownership of the hotel square with your Libertarian or Republican ideals of a free market? A market where government doesn’t pick winners and losers?
How is it that the City Council ignored studies that showed the very cookie-cutter plans that Wallace Bajjali brought to you don’t result in economic development?
How can the city contract with the Southern Independent League without a city-owned stadium to play in?
And one final question for you, as I think back over the discussions we have had through the years that I’ve been a citizen and taxpayer in Amarillo. How is it that when we’ve discussed public policy on health care, you agree with me in private and then take opposite positions in public? You’ll want examples, so I’ll give you two. Certificate of need and that health care isn’t a free market.
I await your responses.